MAYBE 97.177
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could not be shown:
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
If Reductions:
The following If expression
if primGEqNatS x y then Succ (primDivNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y)) else Zero
is transformed to
primDivNatS0 | x y True | = Succ (primDivNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y)) |
primDivNatS0 | x y False | = Zero |
The following If expression
if primGEqNatS x y then primModNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y) else Succ x
is transformed to
primModNatS0 | x y True | = primModNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y) |
primModNatS0 | x y False | = Succ x |
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
gcd' | x 0 | = x |
gcd' | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
is transformed to
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
The following Function with conditions
gcd | 0 0 | = error [] |
gcd | x y | =
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x 0 | = x |
gcd' | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
is transformed to
gcd | yz zu | = gcd3 yz zu |
gcd | x y | = gcd0 x y |
gcd0 | x y | =
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
|
|
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
|
|
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
|
|
gcd1 | True yz zu | = error [] |
gcd1 | zv zw zx | = gcd0 zw zx |
gcd2 | True yz zu | = gcd1 (zu == 0) yz zu |
gcd2 | zy zz vuu | = gcd0 zz vuu |
gcd3 | yz zu | = gcd2 (yz == 0) yz zu |
gcd3 | vuv vuw | = gcd0 vuv vuw |
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
absReal1 | x True | = x |
absReal1 | x False | = absReal0 x otherwise |
absReal0 | x True | = `negate` x |
absReal2 | x | = absReal1 x (x >= 0) |
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
The following Function with conditions
reduce | x y |
| | y == 0 | |
| | otherwise |
= | x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
where | |
|
is transformed to
reduce2 | x y | =
reduce1 x y (y == 0) |
where | |
|
reduce0 | x y True | = x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
reduce1 | x y True | = error [] |
reduce1 | x y False | = reduce0 x y otherwise |
|
|
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
Let/Where Reductions:
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
reduce1 x y (y == 0) |
where | |
|
reduce0 | x y True | = x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
reduce1 | x y True | = error [] |
reduce1 | x y False | = reduce0 x y otherwise |
|
are unpacked to the following functions on top level
reduce2Reduce0 | vux vuy x y True | = x `quot` reduce2D vux vuy :% (y `quot` reduce2D vux vuy) |
reduce2D | vux vuy | = gcd vux vuy |
reduce2Reduce1 | vux vuy x y True | = error [] |
reduce2Reduce1 | vux vuy x y False | = reduce2Reduce0 vux vuy x y otherwise |
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
|
|
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
|
|
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
|
are unpacked to the following functions on top level
gcd0Gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd0Gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd0Gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd0Gcd'0 yx yy |
gcd0Gcd' | x xz | = gcd0Gcd'2 x xz |
gcd0Gcd' | x y | = gcd0Gcd'0 x y |
gcd0Gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd0Gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd0Gcd'0 yv yw |
gcd0Gcd'0 | x y | = gcd0Gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
Num Reduction: All numbers are transformed to thier corresponding representation with Pos, Neg, Succ and Zero.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (product :: [Ratio Int] -> Ratio Int) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primPlusNat(Succ(vuz3700), Succ(vuz301000)) → new_primPlusNat(vuz3700, vuz301000)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primPlusNat(Succ(vuz3700), Succ(vuz301000)) → new_primPlusNat(vuz3700, vuz301000)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat(Succ(vuz4100), Succ(vuz30100)) → new_primMulNat(vuz4100, Succ(vuz30100))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMulNat(Succ(vuz4100), Succ(vuz30100)) → new_primMulNat(vuz4100, Succ(vuz30100))
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS(vuz1620, vuz1630)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMinusNatS(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS(vuz1620, vuz1630)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2)) = 1 + 2·x1 + x2
POL(new_primModNatS(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [15] the rule new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [15] the rule new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_primModNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primModNatS(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primModNatS0(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x1
POL(new_primModNatS00(x1, x2)) = x1
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz187, vuz188), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS00(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ Rewriting
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS0(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Neg(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt0(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primRemInt0(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Neg(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt0(vuz170, vuz16900)) at position [1] we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primRemInt0(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primRemInt0(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1))) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the modular non-overlap check [17] to decrease Q to the empty set.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primRemInt0(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900)) at position [1] we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1))) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the modular non-overlap check [17] to decrease Q to the empty set.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(x0), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1))) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(x0), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(x0, x1))) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the modular non-overlap check [17] to decrease Q to the empty set.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(z1)), Neg(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(x1)), Pos(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
new_gcd0Gcd'(Neg(Succ(z1)), Pos(Succ(x1))) → new_gcd0Gcd'(Pos(Succ(x1)), Neg(new_primModNatS1(Succ(z1), x1)))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS2, Zero)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS2 → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS2 → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero)
Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_primDivNatS(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(new_primMinusNatS1(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS2 → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_primMinusNatS2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_primDivNatS(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primDivNatS0(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 1 + x1
POL(new_primDivNatS00(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2)) = x1
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz162, vuz163) → new_primDivNatS(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_enforceWHNF0(vuz104, vuz90, vuz103, vuz89, :(vuz310, vuz311)) → new_seq(:%(vuz103, vuz89), vuz310, :%(vuz103, vuz89), vuz311)
new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28, vuz27, Succ(vuz300), vuz26, vuz25, vuz29, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF0(new_quot0(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot(vuz27, vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot0(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot(vuz27, vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), vuz31)
new_seq(:%(vuz40, Pos(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Pos(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34, vuz33, Succ(vuz360), vuz32, vuz31, vuz35, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF0(new_quot2(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot1(vuz33, vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot2(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot1(vuz33, vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), vuz31)
new_seq(:%(vuz40, Pos(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Neg(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
new_seq(:%(vuz40, Neg(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Pos(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
new_seq(:%(vuz40, Neg(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Neg(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'0(vuz170, Pos(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(Pos(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → Succ(new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS2, Zero))
new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz187), Succ(vuz188)), Succ(vuz188))
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz169000)) → Succ(Zero)
new_abs(Zero) → Neg(Zero)
new_quot(vuz27, vuz40, vuz300, vuz28) → new_primQuotInt(vuz27, new_gcd22(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(Succ(vuz187))
new_primRemInt0(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_gcd22(Pos(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_gcd23(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28)
new_quot2(Pos(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_primQuotInt(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D2(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34))
new_primQuotInt(vuz27, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vuz3700), Succ(vuz301000)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat1(vuz3700, vuz301000)))
new_primQuotInt0(vuz122, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz30100)) → Zero
new_primMulNat0(Succ(vuz4100), Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_reduce2D1(vuz125, vuz34) → new_gcd21(vuz125, vuz34)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS02(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Succ(vuz1650)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → Zero
new_abs(Succ(vuz340)) → new_absReal1(vuz340)
new_quot2(Neg(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_primQuotInt0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D1(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34))
new_quot2(Pos(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_primQuotInt0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D1(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34))
new_gcd23(Succ(vuz1670), vuz28) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs0(Succ(vuz1670)), new_abs0(vuz28))
new_primDivNatS02(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Zero) → Succ(new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200), Zero))
new_gcd21(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_gcd20(Pos(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_gcd21(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34)
new_gcd20(Neg(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_gcd21(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34)
new_reduce2D2(vuz168, vuz34) → new_gcd2(vuz168, vuz168, vuz34)
new_gcd21(Succ(vuz1250), vuz34) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs(Succ(vuz1250)), new_abs(vuz34))
new_gcd23(Zero, Succ(vuz280)) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs0(Zero), new_abs0(Succ(vuz280)))
new_primMulNat0(Succ(vuz4100), Succ(vuz30100)) → new_primPlusNat0(new_primMulNat0(vuz4100, Succ(vuz30100)), vuz30100)
new_gcd22(Neg(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_gcd23(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28)
new_gcd2(Succ(vuz1270), vuz126, vuz34) → new_gcd0(vuz126, vuz34)
new_gcd0(vuz126, vuz34) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs0(vuz126), new_abs(vuz34))
new_primDivNatS02(vuz162, vuz163, Succ(vuz1640), Succ(vuz1650)) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz162, vuz163, vuz1640, vuz1650)
new_gcd23(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_gcd0Gcd'0(vuz170, Neg(Succ(vuz16900))) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(Neg(Succ(vuz16900)), new_primRemInt0(vuz170, vuz16900))
new_primQuotInt(vuz27, Pos(Succ(vuz16600))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS1(vuz27, vuz16600))
new_absReal1(vuz1240) → Pos(Succ(vuz1240))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Zero, Zero) → new_primModNatS01(vuz187, vuz188)
new_primMinusNatS1(vuz12200) → Succ(vuz12200)
new_primDivNatS01(vuz162, vuz163) → Succ(new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz162, vuz163), Succ(vuz163)))
new_quot0(Neg(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_primQuotInt0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28))
new_quot0(Pos(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_primQuotInt0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D0(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28))
new_primQuotInt(vuz27, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → Succ(vuz1620)
new_primDivNatS1(Zero, vuz12300) → Zero
new_primQuotInt0(vuz122, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_abs0(Zero) → Pos(Zero)
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primRemInt0(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz370), vuz30100) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat1(vuz370, vuz30100)))
new_error → error([])
new_primModNatS1(Zero, vuz16900) → Zero
new_quot2(Neg(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_primQuotInt(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D2(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34))
new_quot0(Neg(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_primQuotInt(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28))
new_reduce2D(vuz167, vuz28) → new_gcd23(vuz167, vuz28)
new_gcd20(Neg(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_gcd2(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34)
new_gcd2(Zero, vuz126, Succ(vuz340)) → new_gcd0(vuz126, Succ(vuz340))
new_gcd22(Neg(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_gcd24(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28)
new_gcd22(Pos(vuz400), Neg(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_gcd24(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28)
new_abs0(Succ(vuz280)) → Pos(Succ(vuz280))
new_gcd0Gcd'0(vuz170, Neg(Zero)) → vuz170
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, vuz30100) → Succ(vuz30100)
new_gcd21(Zero, Succ(vuz340)) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs(Zero), new_abs(Succ(vuz340)))
new_primQuotInt(vuz27, Neg(Succ(vuz16600))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS1(vuz27, vuz16600))
new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, Succ(vuz1890), Succ(vuz1900)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz187, vuz188, vuz1890, vuz1900)
new_reduce2D0(vuz124, vuz28) → new_gcd24(vuz124, vuz28)
new_primRemInt(Pos(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Pos(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz12200)), Succ(vuz123000)) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz12200, vuz123000, vuz12200, vuz123000)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_quot1(vuz33, vuz40, vuz300, vuz34) → new_primQuotInt0(vuz33, new_gcd20(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34))
new_primDivNatS02(vuz162, vuz163, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz162, vuz163)
new_primRemInt(Neg(vuz1700), vuz16900) → Neg(new_primModNatS1(vuz1700, vuz16900))
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Succ(vuz301000)) → Succ(vuz301000)
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vuz3700), Zero) → Succ(vuz3700)
new_gcd24(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_gcd20(Pos(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz34) → new_gcd2(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz34)
new_primMinusNatS2 → Zero
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Succ(vuz169000)) → new_primModNatS02(vuz170000, vuz169000, vuz170000, vuz169000)
new_primQuotInt0(vuz122, Pos(Succ(vuz12300))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS1(vuz122, vuz12300))
new_quot0(Pos(vuz400), Pos(vuz3000), vuz28) → new_primQuotInt(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), new_reduce2D(new_primMulNat0(vuz400, vuz3000), vuz28))
new_gcd24(Succ(vuz1240), vuz28) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_absReal1(vuz1240), new_abs0(vuz28))
new_gcd2(Zero, vuz126, Zero) → new_error
new_primQuotInt0(vuz122, Neg(Succ(vuz12300))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS1(vuz122, vuz12300))
new_gcd24(Zero, Succ(vuz280)) → new_gcd0Gcd'0(new_abs(Zero), new_abs0(Succ(vuz280)))
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz123000)) → Zero
new_gcd0Gcd'0(vuz170, Pos(Zero)) → vuz170
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(vuz170000)), Zero) → new_primModNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz170000), Zero), Zero)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primMulNat0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, x0)
new_gcd24(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS2
new_gcd21(Succ(x0), x1)
new_gcd22(Neg(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_gcd2(Succ(x0), x1, x2)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Zero)
new_primQuotInt(x0, Neg(Zero))
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primQuotInt0(x0, Pos(Zero))
new_absReal1(x0)
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS1(x0)
new_gcd22(Pos(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_primRemInt(Neg(x0), x1)
new_quot0(Pos(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_quot0(Neg(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_abs0(Succ(x0))
new_gcd23(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_gcd0Gcd'0(x0, Neg(Zero))
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primQuotInt0(x0, Neg(Zero))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_quot2(Neg(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_quot2(Pos(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_abs(Succ(x0))
new_gcd0Gcd'0(x0, Neg(Succ(x1)))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_reduce2D2(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_gcd21(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primQuotInt(x0, Neg(Succ(x1)))
new_gcd21(Zero, Zero)
new_reduce2D0(x0, x1)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Zero)
new_error
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_quot(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_primQuotInt0(x0, Pos(Succ(x1)))
new_quot0(Neg(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_gcd23(Succ(x0), x1)
new_gcd24(Zero, Zero)
new_quot2(Neg(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_primModNatS1(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_gcd24(Succ(x0), x1)
new_primRemInt0(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primDivNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_gcd2(Zero, x0, Zero)
new_primRemInt0(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_quot0(Pos(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_primQuotInt0(x0, Neg(Succ(x1)))
new_primDivNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(x0), x1)
new_primQuotInt(x0, Pos(Succ(x1)))
new_gcd2(Zero, x0, Succ(x1))
new_primModNatS1(Zero, x0)
new_primDivNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_gcd20(Neg(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_primDivNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'0(x0, Pos(Succ(x1)))
new_gcd23(Zero, Zero)
new_gcd22(Neg(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_gcd22(Pos(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_primQuotInt(x0, Pos(Zero))
new_gcd0Gcd'0(x0, Pos(Zero))
new_primDivNatS02(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_reduce2D1(x0, x1)
new_primModNatS01(x0, x1)
new_primRemInt(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primDivNatS01(x0, x1)
new_quot2(Pos(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_gcd0(x0, x1)
new_primMulNat0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_reduce2D(x0, x1)
new_abs0(Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_gcd20(Neg(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
new_gcd20(Pos(x0), Neg(x1), x2)
new_quot1(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_abs(Zero)
new_primModNatS02(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_gcd20(Pos(x0), Pos(x1), x2)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_enforceWHNF0(vuz104, vuz90, vuz103, vuz89, :(vuz310, vuz311)) → new_seq(:%(vuz103, vuz89), vuz310, :%(vuz103, vuz89), vuz311)
The graph contains the following edges 5 > 2, 5 > 4
- new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28, vuz27, Succ(vuz300), vuz26, vuz25, vuz29, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF0(new_quot0(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot(vuz27, vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot0(vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), new_quot(vuz27, vuz40, vuz300, vuz28), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 9 >= 5
- new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34, vuz33, Succ(vuz360), vuz32, vuz31, vuz35, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF0(new_quot2(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot1(vuz33, vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot2(vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), new_quot1(vuz33, vuz40, vuz300, vuz34), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 7 >= 5, 9 >= 5
- new_seq(:%(vuz40, Pos(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Pos(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 9
- new_seq(:%(vuz40, Neg(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Neg(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 9
- new_seq(:%(vuz40, Neg(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Pos(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 9
- new_seq(:%(vuz40, Pos(vuz410)), :%(vuz300, Neg(vuz3010)), vuz5, vuz31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vuz40, vuz300, new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), new_primMulNat0(vuz410, vuz3010), vuz31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 9
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ Narrow
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.